<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Auburn Dam Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.auburndamwatch.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.auburndamwatch.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>RIP for Auburn Dam?  Possible, but never certain</title>
		<link>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/rip-for-auburn-dam-possible-but-never-certain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/rip-for-auburn-dam-possible-but-never-certain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Suddeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog: THE LATEST NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auburn dam california]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auburndamwatch.org/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a major new development&#8211;but one that by no means insures the end of an Auburn Dam&#8211;the California Water Board has revoked the water rights it granted to the US Bureau of Reclamation more than 30 years ago.  The landmark decision was made on December 2, 2008. This means that even if the dam [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/rip-for-auburn-dam-possible-but-never-certain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Auburn Dam the Focus of Recent Congressional Panel</title>
		<link>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/auburn-dam-the-focus-of-recent-congressional-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/auburn-dam-the-focus-of-recent-congressional-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Suddeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog: THE LATEST NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/auburn-dam-the-focus-of-recent-congressional-panel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April 9, 2007
The Auburn Dam has officially been resurrected from the dead. The last post I wrote warned that proponents of the dam were gaining momentum in D.Câ€¦well now theyâ€™re off and running. 
David Whitney, of the Sacramento Bee, reported on Friday that â€œa House hearing Thursday on protecting the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta from catastrophic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/auburn-dam-the-focus-of-recent-congressional-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost Study Assigns a Price Tag in Exceedence of 6 Billion Dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/cost-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/cost-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Suddeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog: THE LATEST NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/cost-study-assigns-a-price-tag-in-exceedence-of-6-billion-dollars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-awaited results are finally out&#8230; and Auburn Dam&#8217;s future seems even slimmer than before.  Check out this post from http://blog.aorafting.com:
Last year, Doolittle decided to use (ahemâ€¦waste..ahem) 1 billion taxpayer dollars for yet another study on the proposed Auburn Dam. A dam which, if built, would drown miles of the Middle and North Forks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/cost-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
