<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Auburn Dam Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.auburndamwatch.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.auburndamwatch.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 06:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RIP for Auburn Dam?  Possible, but never certain</title>
		<link>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/rip-for-auburn-dam-possible-but-never-certain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/rip-for-auburn-dam-possible-but-never-certain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Suddeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog: THE LATEST NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auburn dam california]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auburndamwatch.org/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a major new development&#8211;but one that by no means insures the end of an Auburn Dam&#8211;the California Water Board has revoked the water rights it granted to the US Bureau of Reclamation more than 30 years ago. The landmark decision was made on December 2, 2008. This means that even if the dam were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/rip-for-auburn-dam-possible-but-never-certain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Auburn Dam the Focus of Recent Congressional Panel</title>
		<link>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/auburn-dam-the-focus-of-recent-congressional-panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/auburn-dam-the-focus-of-recent-congressional-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Suddeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog: THE LATEST NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/auburn-dam-the-focus-of-recent-congressional-panel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April 9, 2007 The Auburn Dam has officially been resurrected from the dead. The last post I wrote warned that proponents of the dam were gaining momentum in D.C &#124;well now they&#8217;re off and running. David Whitney, of the Sacramento Bee, reported on Friday that a House hearing Thursday on protecting the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/auburn-dam-the-focus-of-recent-congressional-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost Study Assigns a Price Tag in Exceedence of 6 Billion Dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/cost-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/cost-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Suddeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog: THE LATEST NEWS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/cost-study-assigns-a-price-tag-in-exceedence-of-6-billion-dollars/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long-awaited results are finally out&#8230; and Auburn Dam&#8217;s future seems even slimmer than before. Check out this post from http://blog.aorafting.com: Last year, Doolittle decided to use (ahemâ€¦waste..ahem) 1 billion taxpayer dollars for yet another study on the proposed Auburn Dam. A dam which, if built, would drown miles of the Middle and North Forks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.auburndamwatch.org/blog/cost-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using n/a
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 342/356 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: www.auburndamwatch.org @ 2013-05-19 05:49:30 by W3 Total Cache -->